FREE SPEECH if you dare!

Constitutionally Advocating Limited Government, Personal Liberty, & Free Markets. {URL}.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010


Due to technical difficulties, our url has been changed to

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Bigger Government = Less Privacy

Arguably our most famous founding father, Benjamen Franklin passionately declared, "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." Currently, these words come across loud and clear as we sacrifice liberty in the name of safety [hand-in hand with computer technology] the more exposed our citizenry is sacrificing its Fourth Amendment rights.

Franklin's testimony about liberty vs. security is just as relevant now as it was first orated in 1775. As our Founding Fathers fought against the tyranny of British monarchists, our current Constitutionalists use their First Amendment rights against out of control government. These freedom fighters are standing up against the DC insiders, who resemble oligarchs, pretending to duke it out under the guise of the Democratic and Republican Parties. I simply refer to most of these sheep as "modern day progressives."

Give Up Liberty to Gain Security

Beltway insiders are surrendering every one's liberties in order to create "safety." So, where is this so called "safety zone?" Is playing the role of "big brother" really helping our citizenship to stay secured?

The answer is not just a plain no, but a "HELL NO!" To demolish the Fourth Amendment,["The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."]and strike it out with a permanent black marker, politicians and lobbyists create a post-constitutional society which strips citizens of this inalienable right.. By creating an enormous mega government, inhabitants of the United States gives up its once taken for granted right to be left alone.

Will Deserve Neither And Lose Both

I am fully convinced that America is proceeding to more dangerous turf as legislation is piled up, one on top of another. As I comment about how our Fourth Amendment rights to avoid unreasonable searches and seizures are being brought to light, it is becoming more evident that with every statist advocating to increase the size of government, a few more federal departments are added while computer technology is used to track citizen data, directly or indirectly.

Legislative tyranny is self evident every time a lobbyist, big or small, pulls the perpetual wool over the television addicted masses. While many more individuals are now taking on the Jeffersonian model of proactively educating themselves in civics and history, the vast majority of unstudied citizens do not understand the role that a few corrupt self interest/corporate lobbyists are trumping the original intent of the United State's Constitution... legislation in the name of "We the people, not special interests!"

Franklin's wisdom about the subject of liberty and security is just as relevant in this twenty first century digital age as it was during the age of the colonial printing presses. Asides from corrupt lobbyists benefiting by creating "safety minded" legislation, we the people are lied to by the ever expanding government to the point of surrendering our god given Fourth Amendment rights by the punch of a few computer keystrokes.


Labels: , ,

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Judge Napalitano's "The Constitution and Freedom"

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Less Is More

View blog authority

Our founding fathers would be rolling in their caskets upon witnessing the super expansion of our current governmental powers... central powers must be rolled back in order to create a more perfect union.

The Jeffersonian theory of expansion of governmental power at every possible opportunity is becoming more of a reality upon each tick of a clock. This activity is represented by bailouts, so called "economic stimulants," [aka; monetary inflation], military appropriations, congress men's/congress women's salaries, congressional Aid's hourly pay, janitorial pensions, and so on and so forth.

In reality, what is taking place in the circus ring better known to most as the floor of the House and Senate, displays only a portion of the ever expanding federal government. For every Congressman/Congresswoman elected, many more invisible variables enter the picture. Remember, secretive powers corrupts!

Before we deal with the buffoon lobbyists, lieing senators, expansive executors, it is time to improvise a radical new solution. Citizens of the United States ought to toss their apathy in the trash bin and loudly demand to rid the beltway of a corrupt and ultra-large central government. Put on your thinking caps and think out of the box ...Less is more.

A great and very creative solution to reduce government was recently placed before my eyes inside Wayne Allyn Root's informative and most recent book, "Conscience Of A Libertarian." The author, a former Vice-Presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party, sounded off by stating a certain portion of the Nevada model of government ought to be implemented.

The scope of government has gotten so large that we have passed the large government barrier and are moving into super-sized government territory. Our federal bureaucracy is quickly becoming a runaway bullet train ready to roll off its tracks. What kind of action does the Average Joe want implemented?

In his usually boisterous but proud testimonial, Root proclaimed in "Conscience Of A Libertarian," that the best way to reduce government is to cut down on the number of working days. He endorses Nevada's common sense blueprint, allowing only 120 days a year of government intervention. By implementing this cost cutting time restraining exercise, less money would be distributed towards Congressional staffs, the upkeep of federal facilities would be radically lower, lobbyist activity would be forced to corrupt the system less, and government would not be running at the speed of light.

Think of central government which is smaller in the scope of things, taxes are extremely reduced to what the founding fathers prefer, and the liberty we all should aim for is less likely to be intruded upon.


Labels: , , ,

Monday, May 18, 2009

Unalienable Nation

View blog authority

With the recent announcement of Supreme Court Justice David Souter's stepping down, many concerns has been brought fourth that judicial activism will further trump inalienable rights.

On the day that out Founding Fathers transferred the idea of inalienable rights from the Declaration of Independence to the the Constitution, this nation had created a blueprint for judicial officials to inspect and make Constitutional decisions. Well, this was the original intent.

With many days of the sun rising and setting, our government started out in its original small form, getting to the large version, and eventually transfusing to our current "mega government." Thinking about our past history of ill-advised selections, my individualistic mind ponders whether the up and coming Supreme Court Justice will take any resemblance by selecting a judicial activist.

By appointing a judicial nominee using his/her political stance rather than his Constitutional knowledge, the United States of America risks further dismantling our "inalienable rights." Inalienable rights states that god /spiritually given law has been passed down to man and should not be taken away because it is a right given to you. The opposite, unalienable rights, is man arbitrarily defining laws to fit his own need. Currently, most of our laws fit the later category.

My individual hopes ride mighty low about our current president appointing a constitutionally knowledgeable Supreme Court Justice. In college, Mr. Obama pondered over the nature of "world vision constitutional law", dangerously falling into the activist and unalienable camp.


Thursday, February 26, 2009

The Monetary Bubble... The Invisible Phase

While a plethora of economists semi-blindly examines the current deflationary macro-economic trend, reality speaks to the fact that a massive wave of inflation is here. Before anybody calls me crazy... this potential monetary bubble is cycling through the economic phase which I theorize as the "Invisible Phase."

Television propaganda barks to the converted about company x laying off 50,000 individuals while company y economically disperses another few billion dollars. Soon, overly emotional laden talking heads take stage while basically adding to the simplistic theory of deflation. Because Keynesian and Austrian economists are at odds philosophically when it comes to the subject of inflation, their solutions radically differ.

As typical Keynesian do not give credence to the connection between money printing and the case being high inflation, these economists/bankers/activists indoctrinate to the world that printing high volumes of money has positive employment consequences. While their simple minds conclude that inflation is a pure macro-economic price elevation without any reason, various Austrian economist's [Ludvig von Mises, F.A. Hayek,etc.] theory of inflation says in a nutshell that the economic laws of supply and demand also apply to the printing of money. Hence... the more monetary units that is reproduced, the more expensive commodities eventually become.

Yes... the year of 2009 has definitely been documented as a highly deflationary year. Prices have heavily slumped, unemployment has risen while businesses big and small continue to bleed. The armchair Keynesian are shaking a finger at the idea that throughout the history of mankind, correlations have been drawn that by printing massive amounts of banknotes,inflation, including hyperinflation during the rare instance, has a high potential to come into reality.

So... where and when does this monetary bubble start to show signs of movement? Gaze at the St. Louis Federal Reserve System's Inflation Chart [m1]. Take note of the high monetary ascension during the past year [2008-2009].

It is time to give fair warning to citizenry. Keep one eye on the deflationary descents and the other on the monetary inflation. While it is not directly evident that inflation is coming, in reality, this market force is quickly adding up. This "Invisible Phase" of inflation is a warning to customers of the global economy that change is around the corner. During this period of deflation, money is rapidly being printed out of the thin air... meaning money is printed heavily, yet business is declining while unemployment is on the rise.

The central planer's blueprints are in front of us. By spending lots of inflationary money, this "Invisible Phrase," will in time lead the global economy towards the later version of this artificial growth; high and potentially artificial prices.


View blog authority

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, February 20, 2009

No More Beat The Clock

Long long time ago, congressional monetary legislation was commonly gauged in units of millions. As legislative entropy has been inching its way into the trillion dollar land, omnipotent forces have created a possible crash square in the middle of more hurry up legislation.

Most recently, the so called "stimulus" legislation had added to the already unbelievably high numbers permeating the DC area. The across the board plotting of the course of current runaway spending is one very damaging consequence to our republic. All this grandstanding was once again acted upon with a stopwatch clicking and no time to think. Are these most important actions government at work or just another day of speed dating?

By creating a single act of legislation, the often corrupt officials are able to guide their reasoning towards enlightenment. Additionally, the current buzzword "transparency" might actually have a chance to get even a bit closer to reality while a greater segment of the citizenry is able to actually gaze upon its legislation.

Washington, DC's pro-small government advocates,Downsize DC has been advocating for a long while with an idea which would at least force a temporary timeout in order to create time for Senators and Congressmen to very carefully study upcoming legislation. In short, Downsizing DC advocates that all bills in Congress ought to have at least a seven day shelf life before a vote is casted. This potential legislation is known as the Read the Bills Act.

Yes... it is true that any legislative scheme will never be one hundred percent free from political disgrace, but lets require our ever increasingly less reliable politicians to study our incrementally larger legislative process. Potentially corrupt bodies occupying space on Capital Hill must be expected to be accounted for an actual vote of reason. One way to eliminate this governmental mismanagement is to gut anymore speed rounds of "legislative beat the clock."


View blog authority

Labels: , ,